NCAA Tournament Bracket – Post Super Bowl Edition
With football season over, the larger sports world now joins the diehards as college basketball season counts down to March Madness. I’ll speak at more length throughout the week, but kudos to Miami (beat Duke), Notre Dame (beat Marquette), Arizona (swept Cal/Stanford), and Wyoming (beat UNLV) for impressive weekends that propelled them either into the bracket or at least into consideration. Below is my current projected s-curve and a poll for your consideration.
| 1 | Ohio St. | Kentucky | Syracuse | North Carolina | |
| 2 | Duke | Kansas | Baylor | Missouri | |
| 3 | Michigan St. | Florida | Georgetown | Marquette | |
| 4 | Nevada Las Vegas | Creighton | Wisconsin | Florida St. | |
| 5 | Indiana | St. Mary’s | Michigan | Wichita St. | |
| 6 | New Mexico | Iowa St. | Louisville | Virginia | |
| 7 | San Diego St. | Southern Mississippi | Murray St. | St. Louis | |
| 8 | Connecticut | Vanderbilt | Temple | Alabama | |
| 9 | California | Gonzaga | West Virginia | Notre Dame | |
| 10 | Harvard | Kansas St. | Mississippi St. | Memphis | |
| 11 | Miami FL | Brigham Young | Texas | Illinois | |
| 12 | Middle Tennessee | Arizona | Purdue | Long Beach St. | |
| 13 | NCSU/Minnesota | Seton Hall/Washington | Iona | Belmont | |
| 14 | Akron | Virginia Commonwealth | Cleveland St. | Oral Roberts | |
| 15 | Davidson | Wagner | Nevada | Bucknell | |
| 16 | NC Asheville | Stony Brook | Weber St. | Texas Arlington | |
| Norfolk St. | Mississippi Valley St. | ||||
| Next Four | Second Four Out | Bubble Fringe | |||
| Xavier | Northwestern | South Dakota St. | |||
| Cincinnati | Saint Joseph’s | Pittsburgh | |||
| Arkansas | Colorado | Stanford | |||
| Wyoming | Drexel | La Salle | |||
In addition, see the top 90 teams still in contention for the tournament’s at-large bids. The cut line for inclusion is currently between Washington and Xavier.
One thing I’ve learned about these rankings is that since they include projections for all teams, mid-major and low-major teams that are expected to take care of business anyways have more trouble moving higher in the rankings than do major conference teams. As such, the current ratings for a Cleveland St or Middle Tennessee for instance, are near their peak currently. While they could potentially move a little higher by winning convincingly each game, continued winning will mostly maintain each team’s current rating, while a loss will severely impact each team’s chances. This can be seen by how far Nevada dropped after a single home loss from my last update to today. Thus, a few of these teams may look a little better today than they would look after a bad loss in a conference tournament for instance, which is something to keep in mind going forward.
| 1 | Ohio St. | 0.00 | 49 | Cleveland St. | 78.36 | |
| 2 | Kentucky | 0.11 | 50 | North Carolina St. | 80.45 | |
| 3 | Syracuse | 1.71 | 51 | Minnesota | 80.54 | |
| 4 | North Carolina | 5.45 | 52 | Seton Hall | 80.68 | |
| 5 | Missouri | 5.65 | 53 | Washington | 81.46 | |
| 6 | Baylor | 6.03 | 54 | Xavier | 83.38 | |
| 7 | Kansas | 6.46 | 55 | Cincinnati | 85.12 | |
| 8 | Duke | 10.54 | 56 | Iona | 86.29 | |
| 9 | Michigan St. | 10.57 | 57 | Arkansas | 86.91 | |
| 10 | Florida | 14.18 | 58 | Wyoming | 87.55 | |
| 11 | Georgetown | 15.61 | 59 | Northwestern | 87.56 | |
| 12 | Marquette | 24.05 | 60 | Virginia Commonwealth | 88.23 | |
| 13 | Florida St. | 24.18 | 61 | Saint Joseph’s | 89.39 | |
| 14 | Wisconsin | 24.93 | 62 | Oral Roberts | 90.59 | |
| 15 | Creighton | 28.27 | 63 | Colorado | 91.13 | |
| 16 | Nevada Las Vegas | 28.55 | 64 | Akron | 91.14 | |
| 17 | Indiana | 29.54 | 65 | Drexel | 91.71 | |
| 18 | St. Mary’s | 32.48 | 66 | Belmont | 91.94 | |
| 19 | Michigan | 35.18 | 67 | South Dakota St. | 93.58 | |
| 20 | Wichita St. | 36.72 | 68 | Pittsburgh | 94.76 | |
| 21 | Virginia | 37.82 | 69 | Stanford | 95.05 | |
| 22 | Louisville | 39.02 | 70 | La Salle | 95.44 | |
| 23 | Iowa St. | 42.60 | 71 | Colorado St. | 98.12 | |
| 24 | New Mexico | 44.40 | 72 | UCLA | 98.48 | |
| 25 | San Diego St. | 46.02 | 73 | Northern Iowa | 99.17 | |
| 26 | Southern Mississippi | 46.42 | 74 | Missouri St. | 99.21 | |
| 27 | Murray St. | 47.99 | 75 | Marshall | 99.42 | |
| 28 | St. Louis | 48.95 | 76 | Mississippi | 100.18 | |
| 29 | Alabama | 49.46 | 77 | Massachusetts | 100.69 | |
| 30 | Temple | 49.80 | 78 | Louisiana St. | 101.50 | |
| 31 | Vanderbilt | 50.19 | 79 | Central Florida | 102.88 | |
| 32 | Connecticut | 51.36 | 80 | Virginia Tech | 104.74 | |
| 33 | California | 51.50 | 81 | Nevada | 104.76 | |
| 34 | Gonzaga | 52.54 | 82 | Oklahoma | 105.59 | |
| 35 | West Virginia | 52.72 | 83 | Davidson | 107.80 | |
| 36 | Notre Dame | 53.84 | 84 | Dayton | 108.39 | |
| 37 | Memphis | 53.95 | 85 | Oregon | 110.22 | |
| 38 | Mississippi St. | 54.14 | 86 | St. Bonaventure | 110.65 | |
| 39 | Kansas St. | 57.52 | 87 | South Florida | 110.96 | |
| 40 | Harvard | 57.65 | 88 | New Mexico St. | 111.96 | |
| 41 | Miami FL | 66.13 | 89 | Buffalo | 112.20 | |
| 42 | Brigham Young | 68.94 | 90 | Ohio | 112.49 | |
| 43 | Texas | 70.37 | ||||
| 44 | Illinois | 71.17 | ||||
| 45 | Long Beach St. | 72.49 | ||||
| 46 | Purdue | 75.73 | ||||
| 47 | Arizona | 76.03 | ||||
| 48 | Middle Tennessee | 78.28 |
The following chart breaks out the chances at making the tournament field by conference, both in terms of how many teams are currently in the bracket and how many teams are projected to get there.
| Current | Projected | Lock | Proj. In | Bubble In | Bubble Out | In Contention | |
| B10 | 8 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 9 |
| BE | 8 | 8 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 11 |
| SEC | 5 | 5 | 2 | 3 | - | 3 | 8 |
| B12 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| ACC | 6 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 7 |
| P12 | 3 | 2 | - | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
| A10 | 2 | 3 | - | 2 | - | 6 | 8 |
| MWC | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | - | 2 | 5 |
| MVC | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | - | 2 | 4 |
| CUSA | 2 | 2 | - | 2 | - | 2 | 4 |
| WCC | 3 | 3 | - | 2 | 1 | - | 3 |
| WAC | - | - | - | - | - | 2 | 2 |
| SunBelt | 1 | 1 | - | - | 1 | - | 1 |
| MAC | - | - | - | - | - | 2 | 2 |
| CAA | - | - | - | - | - | 2 | 2 |
| Ivy | 1 | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | 1 |
| OVC | 1 | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | 1 |
| MAAC | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | 1 |
| ASun | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | 1 |
| Summit | - | - | - | - | - | 2 | 2 |
| Horizon | 1 | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 |
| BW | 1 | 1 | - | - | 1 | - | 1 |
| Lost Bids | 2 | - | |||||
| Auto Bids | 15 | 16 | 16 | 18 | |||
| 68 | 68 | 33 | 23 | 13 | 35 | 106 |

[...] following teams are those currently in the top 80 from my most recent bracket projection, whose current RPI is at least 10 spots better or worse than what I would expect their RPI to be [...]
NCAA Selection Resumes- RPI vs. Projected RPI « The Quantitative Prognosticator said this on February 8, 2012 at 5:41 pm |